About Judicial Training Institute
The role of the JTI is to promote effective Judicial training for Judges, Magistrates and Judicial Staff. It is also strategically positioned to play a supporting role in the Judicial reform effort in this contemporary era. Its vision is meant to galvanise it towards seeing itself as an organisation that can expand its horizon and realise its goals especially in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Historically, like the case in common law jurisdictions, Judges in Ghana received no additional training on appointment to the Bench from the Bar. The Judicial Service Act of 1960 (and Judicial Service Regulations) provided for the establishment of a training school for registrars and allowed for the training of other Judicial staff. The Act provided legislative backing for Judicial education in Ghana which began in 1965 when the Judicial Service Training School (JSTS) was established and given the mandate of providing training and education for the staff of the Judicial Service of Ghana (JSG). By then training for Judges was limited to ad hoc seminars and mentoring by senior Judges for junior and newly-appointed Judges. Training was extended in the mid-1970s for Magistrates, and in the late 1980s to cover continuing education for Judges.
In 1995, the JSTS was transformed into the Institute of Continuing Judicial Education of Ghana (ICJEG) to reflect its new mandate of offering continual Judicial education to Judges and Magistrates. In 2004, Judicial education in Ghana underwent further transformation, marked by the renaming of the ICJEG as the Judicial Training Institute (JTI) and the appointment of a full-time Director. Since then the JTI has developed and delivered training programmes for new and current members of the Judicial Service with the broader objective of using education and training for developing the human resource needs of the Judicial Service of Ghana, for Judicial reform and ensuring Judicial efficiency in Ghana.
The JTI recognises the fact that individuals with prior experience and expertise at the Bar require additional training in order to make the transition to the Bench. In addition, the JTI acknowledges that social and technical norms in Ghana are constantly evolving, creating an ever-changing set of demands on the Judiciary. Supplementary education and training programmes are needed to enable the Judiciary to meet these demands and function efficiently and effectively in Ghanaian society.
In addition to fulfilling the above functions, the JTI envisions an additional, broader function for Judicial education. It operates according to the principle that Judicial education is essential to the effective administration of justice and the view that Judicial education will play a primary role in Judicial reform in Ghana. By recognising these essential functions of Judicial education, the JTI structures its programmes and activities to meet both the professional needs of individual members of the Judiciary and the Judicial service and the capacity-building needs of the Judiciary and the Judicial service as a whole.
JTI programmes include orientation training sessions for new Judges and Magistrates, professional development programmes focusing on emerging issues and social contexts, and career training for court and administrative personnel.
In sum, the JTI has been engaged in two-fold activity: a. Orientation/Induction Training - for newly-appointed or promoted Judges and Magistrates b. Continuing Judicial Education - on the job training programmes meant to equip Judges and Magistrates to be abreast with the changing developments in law, society and the environment.
The JTI was established on the principle that overall direction and control of Judicial education should be in the hands of the Judiciary. Through the involvement of well-respected Judges in the development and delivery of Judicial education programmes, the JTI both increases the credibility and effectiveness of its programmes and ensures Judicial independence. The JTI fortifies the primacy of peer education in its activities and principles by placing control over the direction, affairs and activities of the Institute with a Board.
The Board's mission is to lead the JTI in the development and delivery of quality Judicial training. Members of the Board are appointed. Below are the current board member of the JTI
Current JTI Board Members
- Justice Sophia O. Adinyira - Chairperson
- Justice Dennis Adjei - Director(JTI)/Member
- Justice Gertrude Torkornoo - Member
- Justice Doreen G. Boakye-Agyei - Member
- Justice V.C.R.A.C Crabbe - Member
- Prof. Philip Ebow Bondzi-Simpson - Member
- Mr. Joseph Ampong-Fosu - Member
- Mr. Frederick Baidoo - Member
- Ms. Mabel N.L Ahele - Deputy Director(JTI)/Secretary
The Board shall be responsible for the appointment of Judicial Education Advisory Committee (JEAC). With assistance from the Director, the Committee will design the curriculum for training. The Committee shall be chaired by a Superior Court Judge
The JTI shall be driven and dedicated towards the realisation of the following priority objectives to serve its stakeholders:
- 1. Enhance Training for Judges, Magistrates, Judicial Staff and other Stakeholders.
- 2. Re-design the Organisational Structure and Improve JTI's Internal Administration Network.
- 3. Enhance Curriculum Design and Delivery.
- 4. Enrich Staff Capacity and Competence.
- 5. Improve Communication Technology and Enhance its Utilisation.
- 6. Encourage a Writing Culture among Judges, Magistrates and Judicial Staff.
- 7. Showcase the JTI Nationally, Regionally and Internationally.
To serve as a centre of excellence for the training of the Judiciary, Judicial staff and other stakeholders to achieve a justice system that is credible, impartial, independent, user-friendly and accessible to all.
Mission Statement of JTI
To design and deliver quality and timely training programmes for the Judiciary, Judicial staff and other stakeholders in order to achieve and support a high standard of professional performance.
The Judicial Training Institute is supported by the following core values:
Stakeholders include traditional clients: the Judges, Magistrates and Judicial staff; and new clients. They can also be grouped into trainable and non-trainable stakeholders.
- 1.Donor community
- 2.The Executive
- 5.Diplomatic missions
- 6.General public
- 1.Paralegal staff
- 3.Civil society organisations
- 4.National Media Commission
- 5.Lands Commission
- 6.Judicial Service staff
- 7.National Commission on Civic Education
- 8.National Labour Commission
- 9.Private bailiffs
- 10.The Ghana Armed Forces
- 11.Ghana Bar Association
- 13.Juvenile court panel members
- 14.Family Tribunal panel members
- 15.Regional Tribunal panel members
- 16.Social Welfare Department officers
- 17.The Legislature
- 18.The Ghana Police (especially Prosecution Division)
- 19.Prisons Service
- 20.The Media
- 22.Rent Control officers
- 23.Judicial Committee of the Traditional Councils of the Houses of Chiefs
- 24.Judicial Committee of the National House of Chiefs
- 25.Judicial Committee of the Regional Houses of Chiefs
- 26.Electoral Commission
Where necessary, fees shall be levied to organize training for the new and trainable clients to provide a source of funding for the Institute.